Articles by kmangino

You are currently browsing kmangino’s articles.

So I just read that there are reports of a Swiss restaurant owner who is going to substitute 75% of the cow’s milk he uses, with BREAST MILK.

In response to this, PETA wrote a letter to Ben & Jerry’s, asking them to switch from cow’s milk to breast milk in all their ice cream production.

Don’t believe me?  See it here.

In a nutshell, PETA’s arguments against using cow’s milk include linking its consumption to human health ailments, and linking its production to harsh treatment of cows and the veal industry in general.

This is fine.

The question is - why replace the cow’s milk with breast milk?  Why not suggest something less controversial, like soy or almond milk?  I know soy ice cream doesn’t have the same texture as cow’s milk ice cream, but do they think that breast milk ice cream will?

It seems like the simple answer to this is to either just be a vegetarian, and know you are not supporting the cow industry at all, or enjoy your cow treats in peace.  But breast milk??

I can picture it already.  A new cottage industry!  Entrepreneurs will flock to build huge factories with sterile stainless-steel equipment and set the place up to look like a living room.  Women will lounge on couches and eat anything they please, breast pumps attached, chatting and watching Oprah.

To save money, maybe we’ll outsource internationally by building ‘plants’ in less-industrialized nations.  Who needs sterile breast pumps when you have eager villagers aplenty, all with years of experience milking now-obsolete cows and goats?

Me, I’d rather go get a pint of Chunky Monkey on the way home, while the getting’s good.

I love fish.  Fish is delish!

But it’s even better when you know where it was caught.

During the last six months or so, I’ve noticed a wonderful change at my local supermarkets: all of the prewrapped fish in the cooler case was labeled with its country of origin.  Things like that really get me excited, which is why I am rushing to share with you what I saw come over the newswire today.

As part of the Farm Bill of 2008, starting September 30, all meat and produce as well as some kinds of nuts must be labeled with their country of origin.  This includes all supermarkets and major mass retailers, but your local butcher shop and restaurant are exempt from this requirement.  Also, some processed foods (like chicken nuggets) are exempt from this.

Overall, this is great news!  Now, we’ll know whether our steak and chicken (or cabbage, for that matter) are grown in the USA or shipped from a foreign land.  Score one for the consumer!

Nowadays, you can’t swing a dead cat without bumping into something about Sarah Palin.

She is absolutely EVERYWHERE, and while the media frenzy is starting to die down a little, we’re about to enter the toughest part of the campaign.  I’ve seen a lot of reports focusing on her very generic answers about foreign policy, on her freezer full of wild game, and on whether she had the volume turned up or down while watching Tina Fey’s skit on SNL.  This is only the beginning…

Yet, I can’t say I know a single thing about her as a candidate.

Everything that the mass media is printing is purely circumstantial!  And it isn’t limited to just this candidate, or just this election.

Mass media frequently releases select information about issues, without printing the whole story.  I know Palin flip-flopped on the Bridge to Nowhere, but I don’t know *why*.  Was it special interest groups?  Party pressure?  Or was there actually logic behind her decision?

Same goes for Obama. He has been hammered for flip-flopping on issues whenever it suits him.  The real question is, if he flip-flopped in his voting record, what prompted the change?  That “why” is almost never reported on, and that’s where we’d really learn something about the character and intent of our candidates.

Every election season, the media becomes tinged slightly yellow, and instead of getting whole pictures of each candidate we get mere caricatures.  This year, it truly is a landmark election: let’s hope that, in the end, it’s not the media who wins.

Mmmmm…. Fish Oil!

Codliver oil.

I still vividly remember those mornings back in grade school, wolfing down my breakfast hoping that if I ate fast enough, Grandma would forget to take that little bottle out of the fridge.

Most mornings, Grandma outsmarted me.  When I had my guard down, she’d press my little body up against the fridge, force a spoonful into my mouth, and hold me there until I demonstrated I’d swallowed it.  Blech!

It took 20 years to recover from the trauma, but now I genuinely thank her for it.  This thoroughly old-fashioned habit (while always popular with Norwegian grandmas) is making a comeback, even here in the states.   Today’s New York Times presents some very compelling results here tying fish oil (or more specifically, Omega-3 and Omega-6 fatty acids) to improvements in childhood behavioral health. According to the article, some health practitioners are even prescribing fish oil before trying medications.  It concludes by advising everyone to “take fish oil only under the supervision of a health care provider”.

Hm, what?  What was that?  I need to ask my doctor before me or my child (if I had one) takes fish oil?

I grew up on this stuff!  My family didn’t ask anyone before they fed it to me.  And I turned out fine…

I thought about this a little, and came up with the following possible reasons.

1.  Mercury and other ocean contaminants.  So, before you take any fish oils, do be careful that the are cleaned of any such impurities.

2.  Doctors think parents might begin to self-treat all misbehaving children with massive doses of fish oil in place of medications for ADHD et al.  Well - don’t do that.  Just increase you (or your child’s) intake of fish oils or omega-3s in a reasonable fashion, with either a single daily supplement or by increasing your intake of fatty fish, walnuts and flaxseeds (ground, of course!).

3.  NYT is afraid of being sued.  I’m putting my money on this one.

The bottom line is, it’s exciting to see that once again, good nutrition and a healthy diet can directly contribute to your well-being and may even positively impact behavioral conditions.  So be good to yourself and eat your Omegas!  After all, the most significant drug we take is the food we eat everyday.

Mystery Sweets

The other day, I was visiting my 1-year-old nephew Omar.  He was eating these weird, puffy little cookies that dissolve in your mouth; they are supposed to develop self-feeding skills in toddlers.  (My nephew weighs over 30 lbs, so I think he’s got the self-feeding thing down pat, but whatever.)  The label prominently reports that the cookies contain real sweet potatoes, but turn the container over to read the ingredients and the truth comes out: full of sugar, and toward the bottom of the ingredients are some powdered sweet potatoes (for color, maybe?).

This label is totally misleading.  What busy mom has time to read this??  And that’s exactly what companies are counting on.  It’s symptomatic of the rampant “creative labeling” problem we have with food in this country.

Are you outraged yet?  If not, you soon will be…

Back in July, the FDA reversed an earlier ruling, declaring that high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) can now be considered “natural” as long as it’s produced without getting synthetic fixing agents in direct contact with the raw materials used in manufacturing HFCS.  Wait, you didn’t hear about this?  Most people didn’t.

So there are forces actually lobbying to create more opportunities to mislead the public!

Don’t get me wrong, the “all-natural” label has always been a little ambiguous, but now it’s completely meaningless.

At this point, maybe you’re saying to yourself, “But isn’t HFCS just made from corn?  That’s natural.”  Sure it is, if you’re nibbling it from the cob.  The fact is that many, many manufactured foods today actually start as natural raw materials. Let’s run through a short list, to keep things in perspective:

Splenda is made from sugar = natural

Until the 1960’s, MSG was made by hydrolysis of wheat gluten = natural (who knows how it’s made now)

Aspirin originally derives from the leaves and bark of the willow tree = natural (And this is just the tip of the iceberg- think of how many drugs have been derived from natural sources!)

My point is, in the olden days EVERYTHING was made from natural sources, but that doesn’t mean it was automatically good for us.  Today, the spirit of the movement toward “natural” foods is to eat foods that are more whole, less manufactured, and more nutritionally balanced, the way nature intended.  It is NOT to eat foods that can lay claim to a natural heritage 5 generations back.  The spirit of the movement is completely obscured when big corporations try to make a buck off of it, by pretending that manufactured, inexpensive ingredients are something that they’re not.

Corn on the cob does not directly contribute to obesity or diabetes, but there’s a raging debate about whether HFCS does… because it’s an out-of-balance food.  The natural sugars in the corn have been separated from the water, fiber and nutrients that you would digest together with the sugars when eating corn.  HFCS is NOT natural.  It should NOT be labeled that way!

And that brings me back to my original gripe: the manipulation of the American people by way of food labels.  Our food is full of so much junk and filler, while on the front of the package it says “contains real vegetables”.  It’s all marketing, and it’s all to make a buck.

I don’t know about you, but if I’m eating HFCS, I want to know that I’m eating it, and I want to choose to be eating it.   Only by staying informed and being vigilant label readers can we all take back control over what we are eating.  Don’t trust the claims on the front of the package; turn the box over, every time.

For more information on this, see: http://naturalfoodsmerchandiser.com/tabid/66/itemid/3139/FDA-reverses-course-High-fructose-corn-syrup-now.aspx.

And from the other side of the fence: http://www.hfcsfacts.com/